Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/29326
Title: | Multiple Score Comparison: a network meta-analysis approach to comparison and external validation of prognostic scores. | |
Authors: | ||
Keywords: | ||
Mesh: | ||
Issue Date: | 2017 | |
Citation: | BMC Med Res Methodol.2017 12;(17)1:172 | |
Abstract: | Prediction models and prognostic scores have been increasingly popular in both clinical practice and clinical research settings, for example to aid in risk-based decision making or control for confounding. In many medical fields, a large number of prognostic scores are available, but practitioners may find it difficult to choose between them due to lack of external validation as well as lack of comparisons between them. | |
PMID: | 29268701 | |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/29326 | |
Rights: | openAccess | |
Appears in Collections: | Fundaciones e Institutos de Investigación > IIS H. U. La Princesa > Artículos | |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PMC5740913.pdf | 932.68 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.