Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/35218| Title: | Analysis of the conflicts of interest disclosed by the program reviewers of the scoliosis research society (SRS) congresses, 2010-2014. | |
| Authors: | ||
| Mesh: | ||
| Issue Date: | 2018 | |
| Citation: | PLoS ONE.2018;(13)10:e0204993 | |
| Abstract: | Conflicts of interest (COI) between industry and surgeons frequently introduce biases into surgical research. The abstracts submitted for presentation in scientific congresses are usually vetted for any indication of commercial bias. Members of review program committees regularly have recognized qualifications, and therefore certain COI are unavoidable. This study aims to determine the prevalence and magnitude of possible COI among those responsible for the selection of presentations at two important international conferences on spine surgery during a five-year period. | |
| PMID: | 30307972 | |
| URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/35218 | |
| Rights: | openAccess | |
| Appears in Collections: | Fundaciones e Institutos de Investigación > IIS H. U. Ramón y Cajal > Artículos | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMC6181342.pdf | 4.63 MB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.