Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/56177
Title: | COVID-19: Critical appraisal of the evidence | |
Authors: | ||
Filiation: | ||
Keywords: | ||
Issue Date: | 2-Sep-2021 | |
Publisher: | Ediciones doyma s a | |
Abstract: | We present the summary of a critical appraisal document of the available evidence on COVID-19, developed with a clinical practice guide format following GRADE methodology. The document tries to provide answers to a series of structured clinical questions, with an explicit definition of the population, intervention/exposure, comparison and outcome, and a rating of the clinical relevance of the outcome measures. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to answer the questions, grouped into six chapters: epidemiology, clinical practice, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and vaccination. We assessed the risk of bias of the selected studies with standard instruments (RoB-2, ROBINS-I, QUADAS and Newcastle-Ottawa). We constructed evidence tables and, when necessary and possible, meta-analysis of the of the most relevant outcome measures. We followed the GRADE system to synthesize the evidence, assessing its quality, and, when appropriate, giving recommendations, rated according to the quality of the evidence, the values and preferences, the balance between benefits, risks and costs, equity and feasibility. (C) 2021 Asociacion Espanola de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. | |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12530/56177 | |
ISSN: | 1695-4033 | |
Appears in Collections: | Centros de Atención Primaria > Artículos | |
Files in This Item:
The file with the full text of this item is not available due to copyright restrictions or because there is no digital version. Authors can contact the head of the repository of their center to incorporate the corresponding file.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License